|
|
|
CAFTA
MAY RUIN U.S. SUGAR
A think
tank warns the sugar imports under the proposed Central American
Free Trade Agreement could disrupt the U.S. sugar program.
Source:
The Miami Herald
Printed: Friday, April 29, 2005
Written by: Jane Bussey |
An
independent think tank warned Thursday that increased sugar imports
required by the proposed Central American Free Trade Agreement could
threaten the U.S. sugar program and turn it into a major burden on
taxpayers.
In Sweet or Sour: The U.S. Sugar Program and the Threats Posed by the
Dominican Republic-Central American Free Trade Agreement, the Minneapolis-based
Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy argued that the yet-to-be-ratified
CAFTA could end up wiping out the majority of U.S. sugar production if
the sugar program is disrupted.
The report said that if sugar acreage was abandoned, it raised the question
of what kind of government subsidies would be required to support the
substitute crops. Most U.S. commodities received taxpayer subsidies but
the sugar program operates at virtually no cost to taxpayers.
The report, prepared by the IATP's Dennis Olson, said increased sugar
imports required under CAFTA, along with unlimited Mexican sugar exports
starting in 2009, would bring U.S. sugar supplies close to the level
that triggers an end to the program.
The result would be a drop in prices for U.S. sugar growers from Florida's
cane fields to the Midwest, as well as for growers in many of the 41
developing countries that export the higher-priced sugar to the United
States, the report said.
The IATP said the sugar program, unlike other U.S. commodity programs,
actually prevents dumping of sugar into the international markets at
below the cost of production, a practice that wipes out farmers in poor
countries.
''The U.S. Sugar Program has offered a sound policy model that has successfully
created market stability at little public expense, while avoiding the
structural over-production that leads to dumping onto international markets,''
Olson said. "The passage of DR-CAFTA would be a nail in the coffin of
this successful program''.
Opposition to the agreement from U.S. sugar growers has been one of the
big stumbling blocks to congressional approval for the trade treaty whose
members would be the Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala,
Honduras and Nicaragua, along with the United States.
|
|