GUEST COLUMNIST : FOCUS BELONGS ON LAKE, NOT ON BLAMING SUGAR

Author: Robert E. Coker
Publication: Stuart News
Printed: February 17, 2007

David Guest's recent opinion applauded a federal court ruling that essentially outlawed the cleanest 3 percent of the water going into Lake Okeechobee while ignoring the worst 97 percent. Until environmental groups let go of their obsession with sugar farmers and start attacking the major pollution problems north of the lake, everything downstream will continue to suffer, including the St. Lucie River.

The fact is that the Clean Water Act was never intended to usurp a state's responsibility for moving water, and the Environmental Protection Agency's proposed rule clarifies this intention.

Apparently Guest and his cronies know better than to suggest that the South Florida Water Management District not operate the pumps that move water from the heavily populated urban areas to the bays, rivers and coastal estuaries. No, he attacks only the farming area south of Lake Okeechobee.

Not only is the water south of the lake some of the cleanest water in the entire system, but the farming areas south of the lake account for less than 3 percent of the water that goes into Lake Okeechobee. Water is back pumped from the rural communities of Belle Glade, South Bay and Clewiston only when excessive rainfall would otherwise flood these farming communities.

Stopping the ability to operate these pumps will cause these communities to be underwater every year. People in the Glades are growing weary of being singled out and treated differently than every other area in the system.

Ninety-seven percent of the pollution and the water flow into Lake Okeechobee come from the northern half of the watershed, draining development from Orlando south. This water is responsible for damaging both the Lake and the coastal estuaries, yet no one is throwing the Clean Water Act around to stop this water or to demand that it be cleaned before entering the lake.

Instead, precious time and tax dollars are wasted on much far lesser issues. There is a limit to restoration resources, and spending more money south of the lake does absolutely nothing for Lake Okeechobee or the coastal estuaries.

Everyone in South Florida lives in a man-made drainage system that we all recognize is not perfect. There are more than 3,000 various structures around the lake that move water so that people, their homes and their property throughout the region do not flood. Yet, only three of those structures, conveniently located in the farming communities, were the target of this judge's ruling.

Scripps Treasure Coast Newspapers, the lake and the people of South Florida would be better served by strongly insisting on an expedited program to actually restore the health of Lake Okeechobee rather than wasting time and money harassing sugar farmers and flooding the Glades communities.

Coker is senior vice president for public affairs for U.S. Sugar.